Comments on: On Ruby on Rails with PostgreSQL, and Acts as Paranoid http://tektastic.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/on-ruby-on-rails-with-postgresql-and-acts-as-paranoid/ Musings by Konstantin Gredeskoul Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:02:26 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: ruby sql indexes http://tektastic.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/on-ruby-on-rails-with-postgresql-and-acts-as-paranoid/#comment-747 ruby sql indexes Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:35:51 +0000 http://tektastic.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/on-ruby-on-rails-with-postgresql-and-acts-as-paranoid/#comment-747 [...] with ruby on Rails project. Covers foreign key constraints, check constraints and partial indexes.http://tektastic.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/on-ruby-on-rails-with-postgresql-and-acts-as-paranoid/firstworks Programming with SQL Relay using the Ruby APIProgramming with sql Relay using the ruby [...] [...] with ruby on Rails project. Covers foreign key constraints, check constraints and partial indexes.http://tektastic.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/on-ruby-on-rails-with-postgresql-and-acts-as-paranoid/firstworks Programming with SQL Relay using the Ruby APIProgramming with sql Relay using the ruby [...]

]]> By: Database Constraints, Stereotypes Rails, Culture, Talmud, Gender, MINASWAN, Religion. But ABSOLUTELY NO BONDAGE PLAY | thirdbIT http://tektastic.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/on-ruby-on-rails-with-postgresql-and-acts-as-paranoid/#comment-630 Database Constraints, Stereotypes Rails, Culture, Talmud, Gender, MINASWAN, Religion. But ABSOLUTELY NO BONDAGE PLAY | thirdbIT Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:20:06 +0000 http://tektastic.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/on-ruby-on-rails-with-postgresql-and-acts-as-paranoid/#comment-630 [...] p. 324). Mostly what I found on the web about rails and foreign key constraints was a bunch of people talking about how they do use them and you’d be crazy and irresponsible not to. Yes, [...] [...] p. 324). Mostly what I found on the web about rails and foreign key constraints was a bunch of people talking about how they do use them and you’d be crazy and irresponsible not to. Yes, [...]

]]> By: kigster http://tektastic.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/on-ruby-on-rails-with-postgresql-and-acts-as-paranoid/#comment-581 kigster Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:45:50 +0000 http://tektastic.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/on-ruby-on-rails-with-postgresql-and-acts-as-paranoid/#comment-581 Thanks! I believe MySQL now supports foreign keys, in fact the syntax shown here should work as is for mysql too. Not the check constraints though. Thanks!

I believe MySQL now supports foreign keys, in fact the syntax shown here should work as is for mysql too. Not the check constraints though.

]]> By: anonymous coward http://tektastic.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/on-ruby-on-rails-with-postgresql-and-acts-as-paranoid/#comment-580 anonymous coward Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:03:37 +0000 http://tektastic.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/on-ruby-on-rails-with-postgresql-and-acts-as-paranoid/#comment-580 Thanks; I didn't know you could add additional db constraints in migrations. Your partial index is also way cool. I agree re: using database-defined constraints: the database handles this more efficiently and complete than Rails; why not let the db handle this? I know this is not the Rails philosophy at this time, but I think David's philosophy might change once MySQL catches up w/ modern ODBMS features. Thanks; I didn’t know you could add additional db constraints in migrations. Your partial index is also way cool.

I agree re: using database-defined constraints: the database handles this more efficiently and complete than Rails; why not let the db handle this?

I know this is not the Rails philosophy at this time, but I think David’s philosophy might change once MySQL catches up w/ modern ODBMS features.

]]>